Construction Management (CM) At-Risk Contractor as Advisor and Builder

Enhancing business success through smarter korea database management discussions.
Post Reply
mostakimvip04
Posts: 370
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2024 4:24 am

Construction Management (CM) At-Risk Contractor as Advisor and Builder

Post by mostakimvip04 »

In Construction Management (CM) At-Risk, the construction manager acts as a consultant during the design phase, providing input on constructability, cost, and schedule. Once the design is finalized, the CM takes on the risk of delivering the project within a guaranteed maximum price (GMP), effectively becoming the general contractor. This method offers the client the benefit of early contractor involvement while retaining budget certainty. It fosters a collaborative relationship between the design and construction teams, aiming for a more efficient and cost-effective project delivery.

Agency Construction Management (CMa) Pure Advisory Role
In Agency Construction Management (CMa), the construction overseas data manager acts solely as an advisor to the client, providing expertise in scheduling, cost control, quality management, and contract administration. The CMa typically does not hold the construction contracts themselves and bears no financial risk for the project's construction cost. This method allows the client to retain multiple prime contracts with various trade contractors. CMa emphasizes the construction manager's pure advisory role, offering project expertise without taking on direct construction responsibility.

Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) Collaborative Risk and Reward Sharing
Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) is a highly collaborative method that brings together the owner, architect, and contractor (and often key subcontractors) into a single, multi-party agreement. This model emphasizes shared risk and reward, common goals, and early involvement of all key stakeholders. IPD projects typically utilize advanced technologies like BIM to facilitate seamless information sharing. The core principle is "best for project" decision-making, aiming to maximize value, reduce waste, and improve project outcomes through intense collaboration and shared accountability.
Post Reply